<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nancy Pelosi is Not Qualified: Reason 4,254</title>
	<atom:link href="http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/</link>
	<description>[tags] "tim glinatsis" turnip politics peanuts golf tech mac music gtd mtb podcasting seamonsters kp football [/tags]</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:20:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jen</title>
		<link>http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/comment-page-1/#comment-36494</link>
		<dc:creator>jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 04:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/#comment-36494</guid>
		<description>TWG, I am not sure what you&#039;re getting at here.  After all, I see no dangling participle-- in fact, I see no participle at all.  I do, however, see an appositive clause.  Could you, perhaps, clarify where you see this snafu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TWG, I am not sure what you&#8217;re getting at here.  After all, I see no dangling participle&#8211; in fact, I see no participle at all.  I do, however, see an appositive clause.  Could you, perhaps, clarify where you see this snafu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/comment-page-1/#comment-32245</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/#comment-32245</guid>
		<description>@vhwycwzd:

Good call. Thanks for stopping in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vhwycwzd:</p>
<p>Good call. Thanks for stopping in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tenacity</title>
		<link>http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/comment-page-1/#comment-27913</link>
		<dc:creator>tenacity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://turnipville.com/index.php/2007/02/21/nancy-pelosi-is-not-qualified-reason-4254/#comment-27913</guid>
		<description>Nancy: not awesome.  You, on the other hand...
; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy: not awesome.  You, on the other hand&#8230;<br />
; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
